Hahn v. Aziyo Biologics, Inc. et al
| David Hahn |
| Aziyo Biologics, Inc., Medtronic Inc, Medtronic PLC and Medtronic, USA, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00265 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Philip P Simon |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
DISMISSAL ORDER: Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #14 is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/1/2021. (shk)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Hahn (Leonas, Theodore) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aziyo Biologics, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Aziyo Biologics, Inc. for Aziyo Biologics, Inc... (Slusher, Jordan) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Medtronic, Inc., answer due 10/21/2021 per #12 . (lhc) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: MDT USA, answer due 10/26/2021 per #12 . (lhc) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Medtronic Inc, Medtronic, USA, Inc. of Automatic Initial Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Jorczak, Robert) |
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Medtronic Inc, Medtronic, USA, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Medtronic PLC for Medtronic Inc, Medtronic, USA, Inc... (Jorczak, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert A Jorczak on behalf of Medtronic Inc, Medtronic, USA, Inc. (Jorczak, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly C Metzger on behalf of Medtronic Inc, Medtronic, USA, Inc. (Metzger, Kimberly) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 9/22/2021. (smb)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Per DE #6 Aziyo Biologics, Inc answer due 10/12/2021. (nae) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan M Slusher on behalf of Aziyo Biologics, Inc. (Slusher, Jordan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Aziyo Biologics, Inc. of Automatic Initial Extension (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin C Schiferl on behalf of Aziyo Biologics, Inc. (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Aziyo Biologics, Inc., Medtronic Inc, Medtronic PLC, Medtronic, USA, Inc.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (mrm) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons filed by David Hahn. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Leonas, Theodore) |
| Filing 2 *No summons submitted by attorney with Complaint.* (bas) |
| Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (bas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aziyo Biologics, Inc, Medtronic Inc, Medtronic PLC, and Medtronic, USA, Inc ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4667693.), filed by David Hahn.(Leonas, Theodore) Modified on 8/26/2021 (bas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
