Arnold, Jr. v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
| Daniel Arnold, Jr. |
| Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. and Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company |
| 2:2021cv00266 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Philip P Simon |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 9/30/2021 before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Pla appeared by atty George Brugess. Dft appeared by attys Sarah Dimmich, Lauren Binger. The Report filed as DE #10 is ADOPTED as amended: Initial Disclosures to be exchanged by 10/14/2021. The last date for any party to seek leave of court to amend the pleadings and join additional parties is 3/2/2022. Plaintiff expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the defendant by 9/2/2022. Defendant expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the plaintiff by 12/2/2022. All discovery to be completed by 1/18/2023. Magistrate Consent forms due by 10/21/2021. All other dates/ddls to be set by presiding judge at a later time. (Tape #ATT HOST (4).) (tc)
|
|
Filing 10
Proposed Pretrial Order Proposed Case Management Order by Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company. (Dimmich, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company.(Dimmich, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 8
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/30/2021 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1280 and enter access code 3293676# when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 9/14/2021. (tc)
|
|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad on August 30, 2021, filed by Daniel Arnold, Jr.. (Brugess, George)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 8/31/2021. (tc)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren A Binger on behalf of Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company (Binger, Lauren)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah N Dimmich on behalf of Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company (Dimmich, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (mrm)
|
|
Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. **NEW CASE** (mrm)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co.( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4667866.), filed by Daniel Arnold, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons)(Brugess, George)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
