Bowes-Northern v. Miller et al
Shedrick Bowes-Northern |
Latesha Miller, Gary Germann, Jessica A Bailey, Porter County of, Darius Woods, Cook County, Porter County Superior Court and Porter County Prosecutors |
2:2021cv00287 |
September 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Theresa L Springmann |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 1:21-cv-02318. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 8 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, on September 14, 2021. (MAC) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] |
Filing 7 CLOSED TRANSFER - ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA. All the events alleged in the complaint occurred in Portage County, Indiana, and Cook County, Illinois. Two of the defendants are located in Valparaiso, Indiana, and the third defendant resides in Chicago, Illinois. Here, most of the acts that plaintiff alleges in support of his claims occurred in Porter County, Indiana, which lies in the Hammond Division of the Northern District of Indiana. 28 U.S.C. 94(a)(2). Two of the three defendants reside in that district as well. No relevant events occurred in the Southern District of Indiana, nor do any of the parties reside in this district. Based on the foregoing, the above action is now TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana at Hammond, Indiana. The filing fee for this action has not been paid and the pending motions in this case remain pending for disposition by the Northern District of Indiana. The clerk is directed to terminate the pending motions on this docket. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/14/2021. (MAC) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against LATESHA MILLER, PORTER COUNTY PROSECUTORS, PORTER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, filed by SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN. (CKM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/7/2021: #1 Proposed Summons & USM) (CKM). [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] |
Filing 6 Amended MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN. (CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN. (CKM) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN.(DJH) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] Modified on 9/15/2021 (rs). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LATESHA MILLER, PORTER COUNTY PROSECUTORS, and PORTER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, filed by SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 exhibits including court records, police report - MP3 not uploaded, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summonses and proposed USM-285 forms)(DJH) Modified on 8/26/2021 (REO). [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 9/15/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.