Gordon v. Finch et al
Gerald Gordon and Gerald Gordon d/b/a Indiana Honey Bees |
Kenneth A Finch, Raymond McCoy, Ryan Cutts and Kenneth Andrew Finch d/b/a Finch Apiary |
2:2021cv00292 |
September 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
John E Martin |
Theresa L Springmann |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) |
Filing 13 ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/13/2022 12:00 PM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 1/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/15/2021. (smb) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/15/2021. (smb) |
Reset answer deadline for Counter Defendant Gerald Gordon to 12/14/2021 per DE #10 . (bas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Tomas M Thompson on behalf of Gerald Gordon (Thompson, Tomas) |
Filing 10 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Gerald Gordon ; answer due by 12/14/2021. (Faichney, Daniel) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel I Faichney on behalf of Gerald Gordon (Faichney, Daniel) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #4 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Gerald Gordon by Ryan Cutts, Kenneth Andrew Finch, Raymond McCoy .(Ault, Andrew) Modified on 10/27/2021 (jdb). |
Filing 7 ORDER: The Court STRIKES from the docket the Answer #6 with leave to re-file a document that complies with the Local Rules on or before 11/1/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 10/26/2021. (lhc) |
Filing 6 *STRICKEN pursuant to #7 * ANSWER to #4 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Gerald Gordon by Kenneth Andrew Finch.(Ault, Andrew) Modified on 10/26/2021 (lhc). |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Dft Finch answer deadline is October 25, 2021; Dft McCoy answer deadline is October 28, 2021; and Dft Cutts answer deadline is October 26, 2021, per #5 . (lhc) |
Filing 5 AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Kenneth Andrew Finch ; answer due by October 25, 2021. (Ault, Andrew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew A Ault on behalf of All Defendants (Ault, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew A Ault on behalf of All Defendants ***Filed in Error refiled at #3 *** (Ault, Andrew) Modified on 9/21/2021 (jdb). Modified on 9/21/2021 (jdb). |
**NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (jdb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4691719.) from Newton County Circuit Court, Cause No. 56c01-2108-PL-955, filed by Kenneth A Finch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons Finch, #4 Exhibit C - Summons McCoy, #5 Exhibit D - Summons Cutts, #6 Exhibit E - Finch Demand)(Ault, Andrew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/21/2021: #7 Corrected Civil Cover Sheet) (jdb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.