Dowdle v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jennifer M Dowdle and Jennifer M. Dowdle |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2021cv00308 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 11/26/2021. (tc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen T Trzyna - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Trzyna - AUSA, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (nhc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T Marvin on behalf of Jennifer M Dowdle (Marvin, Cody) |
| **NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (nhc) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons filed by Jennifer M Dowdle. (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T Marvin on behalf of Jennifer M Dowdle (Marvin, Cody) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0755-4706168.), filed by Jennifer M Dowdle. (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Schultz, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
