Macchia v. Landline Trans, LLC et al
jeffrey macchia and Jeffery Macchia |
Landline Trans, LLC and Tamas Rosenberger |
2:2021cv00398 |
December 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Philip P Simon |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 12 First MOTION to Continue Preliminary Pre-Trial Conference by Plaintiff Jeffery Macchia. (Schafer, Todd) |
Filing 11 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc) |
|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S Schafer on behalf of Jeffery Macchia (Schafer, Timothy) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S Schafer, II on behalf of Jeffery Macchia (Schafer, Timothy) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd S Schafer on behalf of Jeffery Macchia (Schafer, Todd) |
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (jdb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S Schafer, II on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Schafer, Timothy) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by J Thomas Vetne on behalf of All Defendants (Vetne, J) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4787367.) from Lake Superior Court, Cause No. 45d02-2111-ct-001152, filed by Landline Trans, LLC, Tamas Rosenberger. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Process and pleadings from state court, #2 Exhibit demand, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Vetne, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.