Ratulowski v. PNC Bank, N.A.
| Vincent I Ratulowski |
| PNC Bank, N.A. d/b/a PNC Auto Finance and PNC Bank, N. A. doing business as PNC Auto Finance |
| 2:2022cv00004 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Application for Attorney Jason M. Frank to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Vincent I. Ratulowski. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number AINNDC-4851333(Frank, Jason)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Franklin D Azar PHV for Vincent I Ratulowski. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 1/24/2022. (ace)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Margeaux R Azar PHV for Vincent I Ratulowski. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 1/24/2022. (ace)
|
|
Filing 9
Application for Attorney Franklin D. Azar to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Vincent Ratulowski. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number AINNDC-4811603 (Attachments: #1 CO Certificate of Good Standing, #2 TX Certificate of Good Standing, #3 U.S. Supreme Court Certificate of Good Standing)(Azar, Franklin)
|
|
Filing 8
Application for Attorney Margeaux R. Azar to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Vincent Ratulowski. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number AINNDC-4811333 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Azar, Margeaux)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael D Murphy PHV for Vincent I Ratulowski. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 1/20/2022. (ace)
|
|
Filing 6
Application for Attorney Michael D. Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Vincent Ratulowski. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number AINNDC-4807980 (Attachments: #1 CO Certificate of Good Standing, #2 IL Certificate of Good Standing, #3 U.S. Supreme Court Certificate of Good Standing)(Murphy, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Brian Hanlin PHV for Vincent I Ratulowski. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 1/13/2022. (ace)
|
|
Filing 4
Application for Attorney Brian Hanlin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Vincent Ratulowski. Pro Hac Vice fee of $ 96 has been received, receipt number AINNDC-4802933 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Hanlin, Brian)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Vincent I Ratulowski. PNC Bank, N. A. waiver sent on 1/10/2022, answer due 3/11/2022. (Rock, Robert)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to PNC Bank, N. A.. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (nhc)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (nhc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against PNC Bank, N.A. d/b/a PNC Auto Finance( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4798835.), filed by Vincent I Ratulowski. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Ratulowski RISC, #2 Exhibit B - Ratulowski GAP Addendum, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons)(Rock, Robert)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
