Woolsey v. Woolsey
| Jonathan David Woolsey |
| Cortney Na Woolsey |
| 2:2022cv00012 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING #8 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order Remanding Case to State Court MOTION TO RECONSIDER REMAND OF REMOVAL filed by Cortney Na Woolsey. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/7/2022. (mrm)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order Remanding Case to State Court MOTION TO RECONSIDER REMAND OF REMOVAL by Defendant Cortney Na Woolsey. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Attachment, #2 Supplement Attachment, #3 Supplement Attachment, #4 Supplement Attachment, #5 Supplement Attachment, #6 Supplement Attachment)(Davis, John)
|
|
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING the case to the Cass County, Michigan, Circuit Court. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/3/2022. (cc: Cass County Michigan, Circuit Court)(lhc)
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to #1 Notice of Removal by Jonathan David Woolsey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-C, #2 Exhibit Exhibits D-G)(Swisher, Thomas) Modified on 2/3/2022 (kms).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas D Swisher on behalf of Jonathan David Woolsey (Swisher, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/21/2022. (tc)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (nhc)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by John Horace Davis on behalf of Cortney Na Woolsey (Davis, John)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4809302.) from Cass County Michigan Circuit Court, Cause No. 2018-000596-DM, filed by Cortney Na Woolsey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Addendum Cass County Michigan records, etcetera, #3 Addendum Cass County Michigan records, etcetera, #4 Addendum Cass County Michigan records, etcetera, #5 Addendum Porter County Indiana records, etcetera, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woolsey v. Woolsey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan David Woolsey | |
| Represented By: | Thomas D Swisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cortney Na Woolsey | |
| Represented By: | John Horace Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
