Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund v. Correct Construction, Inc. et al
| Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund |
| Correct Construction, Inc doing business as Correct Mechanical, Inc, Solid Platforms, Inc. and Volare Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00057 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joshua P Kolar |
| Philip P Simon |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Finding good cause shown and noting the parties' agreement, the Court GRANTS #10 Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time. Defendants to respond to the complaint by 5/12/2022. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 5/5/2022. Text entry order. (tc)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendants Correct Construction, Inc, Solid Platforms, Inc., Volare Corporation. (Bartrom, Adam)
|
|
Filing 9
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2022 09:30 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1280 and enter access code 3293676# when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 4/28/2022. (tc)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 3/28/2022. (tc)
|
|
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Per DE 6, Correct Construction, Inc answer due 5/5/2022; Solid Platforms, Inc. answer due 5/5/2022; Volare Corporation answer due 5/5/2022. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 6
AGREED NOTICE to extend time to file answer filed by Correct Construction, Inc, Solid Platforms, Inc., Volare Corporation ; answer due by 05/05/2022. (Payne, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas C Payne on behalf of Correct Construction, Inc, Solid Platforms, Inc., Volare Corporation (Payne, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Adam L Bartrom on behalf of Correct Construction, Inc, Solid Platforms, Inc., Volare Corporation (Bartrom, Adam)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Correct Construction, Inc, Solid Platforms, Inc., Volare Corporation. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (shk)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (shk)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Paul E Stoehr on behalf of Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund (Stoehr, Paul)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4857155.), filed by Trustees of the Teamsters Union No. 142 Pension Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Stoehr, Paul)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
