Buche et al v. Walgreens Company
Plaintiff: David L. Buche and Karen Buche
Defendant: Walgreen Co and Walgreens Company doing business as Walgreens Drug Store
Not Classified By Court: Anthony F. Tavitas
Case Number: 2:2022cv00073
Filed: March 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joshua P Kolar
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2022 Filing 12 TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 5/5/2022, before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Pltfs appeared by atty Charles Dargo. Dft appeared by atty Susan Swing. The Report filed as DE #10 is ADOPTED as follows: Initial Disclosures to be exchanged by 6/6/2022. Fact discovery to be completed by 2/6/2023. All discovery to be completed by 4/17/2023. Plaintiff expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the defendant by 2/1/2023. Defendant expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the plaintiff by 4/1/2023. The last date to seek leave of court to join additional parties and to amend the pleadings for Pltf is 6/6/2022; for Dft is 7/11/2022. Parties anticipate the case should be ready for a 5 day jury trial by August or September of 2023. Anthony Tavitas appointed as mediator. Results of the mediation shall be filed with the court no later than 10 days before the final pretrial conference. All other agreements of the parties concerning discovery are adopted. Magistrate Consent forms due by 5/26/2022. All other dates/ddls to be set by presiding judge at a later time. (Tape #ATT HOST 1.) (tc)
May 3, 2022 Filing 11 First REPORT of Mediation Acceptance of Mediator by Anthony F. Tavitas.(Tavitas, Anthony)
April 27, 2022 Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Swing, Susan)
April 19, 2022 Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/5/2022 09:00 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1280 and enter access code 3293676# when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 4/19/2022. (tc)
April 4, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Walgreens Company.(Swing, Susan)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 3/30/2022. (tc)
March 28, 2022 Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. NEW CASE. (nal)
March 25, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan K Swing on behalf of Walgreen Co (Swing, Susan)
March 25, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walgreen Co identifying Corporate Parent Walgreen Co for Walgreen Co.. (Hearn, Edward)
March 25, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward W Hearn on behalf of Walgreen Co (Hearn, Edward)
March 25, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINNDC-4871905) from Jasper Superior Court, Cause No. 37D01-2201-CT-000064, filed by Walgreen Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit). (Hearn, Edward)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buche et al v. Walgreens Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David L. Buche
Represented By: Charles P Dargo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Buche
Represented By: Charles P Dargo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co
Represented By: Susan K Swing
Represented By: Edward W Hearn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreens Company doing business as Walgreens Drug Store
Represented By: Edward W Hearn
Represented By: Susan K Swing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Anthony F. Tavitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?