Bey v. Biden et al
Plaintiff: Jamil Malik Bey
Defendant: Joe Biden and The United States
Case Number: 2:2022cv00152
Filed: June 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER: For reasons stated in order, Petitioners Points and Authorities in Support of Response/Motion to Reconsider/Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment DE #6 is DENIED. However, the Court clarifies that the previous dismissal of the case DE #3 is without prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 08/01/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(sej)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Response & Motion to Reconsider Order of Judge Philip Simon Dismissing Complaint, by Jamil Malik Bey. (1 Zip drive received with exhibits along with DE 6 filing. Zip drive in Hammond clerk's office.) (shk)
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Response to June 7th Order dismissing action / MOTION to Reconsider / Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgement, by Plaintiff Jamil Malik Bey. (1 Zip drive received with exhibits along with DE 7 filing. Zip drive in Hammond clerk's office.) (Attachments: #1 Declarations in support, #2 Proposed Order)(shk)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed re #3 Order and #4 Clerk's Judgment. (nhc)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.(Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail#7099 3400 0003 4515 7414) (rmf) Modified to add certified mail information on 6/7/2022 (nhc).
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 6/7/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail#7099 3400 0003 4515 7414) (rmf) Modified to add certified mail information on 6/7/2022 (nhc).
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Cost by Plaintiff Jamil Malik Bey. (nhc)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT and Request for Injunction against Joe Biden, The United States, filed by Jamil Malik Bey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (nhc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bey v. Biden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamil Malik Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Biden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?