Buckley v. Muttini et al
Jason Buckley |
Paul Muttini and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
Tom Hays |
2:2022cv00159 |
June 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
Andrew P Rodovich |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 7/22/2022, before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. Dfs appeared by atty Thomas Ehrhardt. The Report filed as DE #10 is APPROVED and ADOPTED as follows: Initial Disclosures to be exchanged by 8/12/2022. All discovery to be completed by 7/21/2023. Plaintiff expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the defendant by 3/23/2023. Defendant expert witness disclosures and reports to be delivered to the plaintiff by 5/12/2023. Rule 26(e) supplements due by 6/14/2023. The last date to seek leave of court to join additional parties and to amend the pleadings for Pltf is 10/5/2022; for Dfts is 10/21/2022. Tom Hays appointed as mediator. Results of the mediation shall be filed with the court no later than 10 days before the final pretrial conference. Magistrate Consent forms due by 8/12/2022. All other dates/ddls to be set by presiding judge at a later time. (tc) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah M Cafiero on behalf of Jason Buckley (Cafiero, Sarah) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bradley, Bryan) |
Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc) |
Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/22/2022 09:30 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. Court to initiate the call. The attorneys shall provide a direct dial number to Judge Rodovich's Case Manager at teresa_castillo@innd.uscourts.gov at least 24 hours prior to the conference. The direct dial number must bypass any receptionist or automated answering system. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/29/2022. (tc) |
Filing 7 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint by Paul Muttini, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc..(Ehrhardt, Thomas) |
Filing 6 STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED. State Court Case No. 45D01-2205-CT-426. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(shk) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 6/22/2022. (tc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan L Bradley on behalf of Jason Buckley (Bradley, Bryan) |
**NEW CASE** Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (mlc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas S Ehrhardt on behalf of All Defendants (Ehrhardt, Thomas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4946205.) from Lake Superior Court, Cause No. 45D01-2205-CT-000426, filed by Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Paul Muttini. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Ehrhardt, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.