O'Rourke v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
| Robert O'Rourke |
| Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company |
| 2:2022cv00174 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| James T Moody |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) |
Filing 7
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/8/2022 11:30 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 9/2/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/26/2022. (smb)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/26/2022. (smb)
|
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company.(Dimmich, Sarah) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 7/19/2022. (smb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scotty N Teal on behalf of Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company (Teal, Scotty) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah N Dimmich on behalf of Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company (Dimmich, Sarah) |
| **NEW CASE** Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (rmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BINNDC-4956609.), filed by Robert O'Rourke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Waiver of Service of Summons)(Brugess, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: O'Rourke v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert O'Rourke | |
| Represented By: | George T Brugess |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Sarah N Dimmich |
| Represented By: | Scotty N Teal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
