Johnson et al v. Cahillane
| Ann Marie Johnson and Jaylen Johnson |
| Mary Cahillane |
| 2:2022cv00180 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed as to #5 Order Dismissing Case and #6 Clerks Judgment. (asd)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se parties via certified mail 7000 1670 0012 9260 9284)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING #2 and #3 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ann Marie Johnson and Jaylen Johnson. DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION to Stay Eviction by Plaintiff Ann Marie Johnson. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 7/11/2022.(Copy mailed to pro se parties via certified mail 7000 1670 0012 9260 9284)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 4
EMERGENCY MOTION to Stay Eviction by Plaintiff Ann Marie Johnson. (jdb)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Jaylen Johnson. (jdb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ann Marie Johnson. (jdb)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Mary Cahillane, filed by Ann Marie Johnson, Jaylen Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 USM-285 Form)(jdb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
