Hagan v. Evans Delivery Company, Inc.
| Marc Hagan |
| Evans Delivery Company, Inc. and Anthony Del Nagro |
| 2:2022cv00230 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS: Rule 26(a)(1) initial exchanges must be completed, but not filed with the Court, by 10/24/2022; Plaintiff's deadline to seek leave to amend the pleadings is 02/01/2023; Defendants' deadline to seek leave to amend the pleadings is 02/15/2023; The deadline to complete all fact and expert discovery is 12/08/2023; Plaintiff's expert witness disclosures and reports are to be provided to Defendants by 08/04/2023; Defendants' expert witness disclosures and reports are to be provided to Plaintiff by 09/04/2023; Rule 26(e) supplements are due by 10/06/2023; The deadline for parties to review and return either the consent to or the declination of the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge is extended to 11/07/2022. The Court VACATES the Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for September 29, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 09/23/2022. (jdb)
|
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Buba, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J Buba on behalf of Marc Hagan (Buba, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Ring on behalf of Marc Hagan (Ring, Kyle) |
| Filing 10 STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED (docket sheet). (nhc) |
| Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/29/2022 11:00 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Parties proposed discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 9/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/15/2022. (smb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 8/15/2022. (smb)
|
| Filing 6 EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC.S ANSWER to Complaint FOR DAMAGES by Evans Delivery Company, Inc..(Hunt, Brian) |
| Filing 5 ANTHONY DEL NAGROS ANSWER to Complaint FOR DAMAGES by Anthony Del Nagro.(Hunt, Brian) |
| Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE) (jld) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Evans Delivery Company, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, Corporate Disclosure pursuant to 7.1 (Hunt, Brian) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian J Hunt on behalf of Anthony Del Nagro, Evans Delivery Company, Inc. (Hunt, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-4993275.) from Lake Superior Circuit Court, Cause No. 45D05-2207-CT-000648, filed by Evans Delivery Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hunt, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
