Houdasheldt v. United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Timothy J Houdasheldt
Defendant: United States of America, United States Society, Identity Shuffle and Covert People
Case Number: 2:2022cv00248
Filed: August 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joshua P Kolar
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff Houdasheldt's "Amendment to Complaint" #5 is construed as a motion for leave to amend his complaint, and is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 9/15/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
September 6, 2022 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed re #3 Order and #4 Clerks Judgment. (nhc)
August 29, 2022 Filing 5 RECEIPT of Amendment to Complaint from Timothy J Houdasheldt (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (nhc) Modified on 8/31/2022 (kmt).
August 26, 2022 Filing 4 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail #7003 1680 0005 6489 6555). (shk) Modified on 8/26/2022 to add certified info). (nal)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis [DE 2] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 8/26/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party certified mail #7003 1680 0005 6489 6555). (shk) Modified on 8/26/2022to add certified info). (nal)
August 25, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy J Houdasheldt. (nhc)
August 25, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Covert People, Identity Shuffle, United States Society, United States of America, filed by Timothy J Houdasheldt. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (nhc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Houdasheldt v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy J Houdasheldt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Society
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Identity Shuffle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Covert People
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?