Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Christal Robinson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 2:2022cv00253
Filed: August 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: William C Lee
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge William C Lee added. Magistrate Judge John E Martin no longer assigned to case. (shk)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 9/29/2022. (smb)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Irvin - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Irvin - AUSA, Brian)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS obo Christal Robinson. Commissioner of Social Security and U.S. Attorney General served 9/6/2022. U.S. Attorney served on 9/7/2022 answer due 11/7/2022.(mrm)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (cc: USMS) (jdb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2022: #1 Corrected Summons) (jdb).
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; WAIVES payment of the filing fee; and DIRECTS, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the United States Marshals Service to effect service of process on the defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 08/31/2022. (cc: USMS) (jdb)
August 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (NEW CASE, MOTION PENDING) (jld)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christal Robinson. (Haungs, Elizabeth)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with n against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Christal Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Haungs, Elizabeth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christal Robinson
Represented By: Elizabeth A Haungs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Brian Irvin - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?