Mason v. Capital One Auto Finance Inc.
| Prentice Mason |
| Capital One Auto Finance Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00301 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| John E Martin |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/14/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(smb)
|
|
***Waiver of Service Deadline terminated. (nal)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Capital One Auto Finance Inc.. Capital One Auto Finance Inc. waiver sent on 10/24/2022, answer due 12/23/2022. (Pilgrim, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey D Pilgrim on behalf of Capital One Auto Finance Inc. (Pilgrim, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. Waiver of Service due by 11/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (sej)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 , DEFERS payment of the filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff to pay the $350 filing fee from the proceeds of any recovery received in this case, and DIRECTS the clerk to request Waiver of Service from (and, if necessary, the United States Marshals Service to serve process on) the defendant at Corporation Service Company, Attn: Capital One Auto Finance, 211 E. 7th St., Ste. 620, Austin, TX 78701, with a copy of this order and the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 10/18/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party and to defendant as directed in Order)(sej)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Prentice Mason. (nhc)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Capital One Auto Finance Inc., filed by Prentice Mason. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 USM 285 Form). (nhc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mason v. Capital One Auto Finance Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Prentice Mason | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capital One Auto Finance Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey D Pilgrim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
