Chicago City of v. United States Steel Corporation
Plaintiff: City of Chicago and Chicago City of
Defendant: United States Steel Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv00357
Filed: November 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Jon E DeGuilio
Referring Judge: Joshua P Kolar
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by United States Steel Corporation. (Drucker, Paul)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Chicago City of. (Burke, Fiona)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 1/3/2023. (tc)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Fredric P Andes on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (Andes, Fredric)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Finding good cause shown and noting the parties' agreement, the Court GRANTS #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's response to #6 Motion to Dismiss due by 1/6/2023. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 12/13/2022. Text entry order. (tc)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 Memorandum in Support, #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM unopposed by Plaintiff Chicago City of. (Burke, Fiona)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul M Drucker on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (Drucker, Paul)
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The Court GRANTS #9 Motion to Withdraw and ORDERS that the appearance of Attorney John E. Rigney on behalf of Plaintiff City of Chicago is WITHDRAWN. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 12/2/2022. Text entry order. (tc)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Plaintiff Chicago City of. (Rigney, John)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer and reassign this case to Judge DeGuilio, pursuant to N.D. Ind. L.R. 40.1(f)(1). Case reassigned to Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio for all further proceedings. Judge Philip P Simon no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 11/29/2022. (mrm)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support of #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by United States Steel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Drucker, Paul)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant United States Steel Corporation. (Drucker, Paul)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 **ATTORNEY FILED IN ERROR refiled at #6 ** MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant United States Steel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Drucker, Paul) Modified to mark as attorney filing error on 11/30/2022 (nhc).
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Fiona A Burke on behalf of Chicago City of (Burke, Fiona)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 11/29/2022. (tc)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order **NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (kmt)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5085687.) from Porter Superior Court, Cause No. 64D01-2210-CT-009001, filed by United States Steel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Drucker, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chicago City of v. United States Steel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chicago City of
Represented By: Fiona A Burke
Represented By: John E Rigney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Steel Corporation
Represented By: Paul M Drucker
Represented By: Fredric P Andes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?