Resendez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Rigoberto Resendez |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA (Court Use Only) |
2:2022cv00366 |
November 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Joshua P Kolar |
Philip P Simon |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, the claimant/plaintiff is directed to file his/her opening brief by the deadline set out below. Failure to do so could result in dismissal of this case pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Briefs under this rule are subject to the page limitations in Local Rule 7-1(e). The Social Security Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 3/6/2023. The Social Security Response Brief of the Government is due by 4/17/2023. The Social Security Reply Brief of the Plaintiff is due by 5/1/2023. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/24/2023. Text entry order. (tc) |
Filing 11 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of Social Security. (Payne, Lindsay) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay B Payne on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Payne, Lindsay) |
Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 1/20/2023. (tc) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Irvin - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Irvin - AUSA, Brian) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USMS obo Rigoberto Resendez. Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney General, and U.S. Attorney served on 12/22/2022, answer due 2/21/2023. (ash) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (cc: USMS) NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (shk) |
Filing 5 **FILED IN ERROR** Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal action ( #1 Complaint) sent to the Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security Answer or Motion due 2/3/2023. Pursuant to General Order #2022-20, the briefing schedule is as follows: The plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 42 days after the answer is filed or 42 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under Rule 4(c) of the Supplemental Rules, whichever is later. The Commissioner's response brief must be filed 42 days after service of the opening brief. Any reply brief must be filed 14 days after service of the response brief. (shk) Modified on 12/6/2022 (shk). |
Filing 4 ORDER: Plaintiff Rigoberto Resendezs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is GRANTED and the filing fee is WAIVED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), the United States Marshals Service is directed to effect service of process on the defendant. (cc: USMS) Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 12/2/2022. (shk) Modified on 12/6/2022 (shk). |
**NEW CASE** **PENDING MOTION** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (sej) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Rigoberto Resendez. (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T Marvin on behalf of Rigoberto Resendez (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Rigoberto Resendez. (Attachments: #1 AC Decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 US Marshal Forms)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.