Jiles v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kimberly T Jiles
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Case Number: 2:2022cv00396
Filed: December 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Referring Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS IN A SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL CASE sent to all parties. Magistrate Consent forms due by 1/20/2023. (smb)
January 5, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Irvin - AUSA on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Irvin - AUSA, Brian)
January 4, 2023 Filing 5 Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal action ( #1 Complaint) sent to the Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security Answer or Motion due 3/6/2023. Pursuant to General Order #2022-20, the briefing schedule is as follows: The plaintiff's opening brief must be filed within 42 days after the answer is filed or 42 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion under Rule 4(c) of the Supplemental Rules, whichever is later. The Commissioner's response brief must be filed 42 days after service of the opening brief. Any reply brief must be filed 14 days after service of the response brief. (jdb)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 ; WAIVES payment of the filing fee; and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to docket a Notice of Commencement of Social Security Appeal Action. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 01/03/2023. (jdb)
December 22, 2022 **NEW CASE** **MOTION PENDING** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (nhc)
December 21, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kimberly T Jiles. (Marvin, Cody)
December 21, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody T Marvin on behalf of Kimberly T Jiles (Marvin, Cody)
December 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Kimberly T Jiles. (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 USM forms)(Marvin, Cody)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jiles v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly T Jiles
Represented By: Cody T Marvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Brian Irvin - AUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?