Maller v. Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC
Plaintiff: Robert E Maller
Defendant: Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC doing business as Top Fitness
Case Number: 2:2023cv00008
Filed: January 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Joshua P Kolar
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC.(Geller, Schuyler)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 3/23/2023 09:00 AM (Central time) before Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar. Parties are instructed to dial 877-336-1280 and enter access code 3293676# when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 3/2/2023. (tc)
February 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: The Court STRIKES #10 Plaintiff's Preliminary Witness and Exhibit List. Pursuant to Northern District of Indiana Local Rule 26-2(a)(1)(A), initial disclosures are not to be filed, subject to exceptions not applicable here. Approved by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 2/16/2023. Text entry order. (tc)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STRICKEN RE 11 MINUTE ORDER: Witness List/Exhibit List Plaintiff's Preliminary by Robert E Maller. (Kondras, Robert) Modified on 2/16/2023 (tc).
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 2/2/2023. (tc)
February 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Set Deadline: Defendant, Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC answer due 3/9/2023 per #8 Notice. (jdb)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Agreed Initial Extension of Time to Respond re #5 Amended Complaint, #1 Complaint, #7 Notice of Appearance by Defendant Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC. (Geller, Schuyler) Modified on 2/2/2023 to reflect document is not a motion (tc).
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Schuyler D Geller on behalf of Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC (Geller, Schuyler)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert E Maller. Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC served on 1/17/2023, answer due 2/7/2023. (Kondras, Robert)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Amended Pleadings Deadline terminated. (mlc)
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT (containing redaction ordered in Docket Entry 4) against Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC, filed by Robert E Maller.(Kondras, Robert)
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to SEAL DE 1 (Complaint For Damages And Equitable Relief And Demand For Jury Trial). The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to FILE a redacted copy of the sealed document concealing the month and day of Plaintiff's birth on or before January 25, 2023. Finally, the Court REMINDS counsel to file only documents, including exhibits, that comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and ADVISES counsel that future filings containing an individual's birth date other than the year of birth may be stricken. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar on 1/18/23. (ksp)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (kmt)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order **NEW CASE** Judge Philip P Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P Kolar added. (kmt)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert P Kondras, Jr on behalf of ROBERT E. MALLER (Kondras, Robert)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CHICAGO FITNESS PARTNERS, LLC d/b/a TOP FITNESS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5127199.), filed by ROBERT E. MALLER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Kondras, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maller v. Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E Maller
Represented By: Robert P Kondras, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chicago Fitness Partners, LLC doing business as Top Fitness
Represented By: Schuyler D Geller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?