Pierce v. Zantac Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Cynthia Pierce
Defendant: Zantac Corporation, Family Dollar, Sanofi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVS and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Case Number: 2:2023cv00111
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Andrew P Rodovich
Referring Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Wrongful Death
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2023 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Johnson & Johnson. (Eaton, Joseph)
May 15, 2023 Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Cynthia Pierce. (shk)
April 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FOR JUDGE THERESA L SPRINGMANN: The Court has received #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Johnson & Johnson. Plaintiff Cynthia Pierce has to 5/16/2023 to file a response. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(rs)
April 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 4/25/2023. cc: Pro se Pltf (tc)
April 21, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Beth A Behrens on behalf of Johnson & Johnson (Behrens, Beth)
April 20, 2023 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - JnJ 10K, #2 Exhibit B - FTC Decision and Order)(Eaton, Joseph)
April 20, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant Johnson & Johnson. (Eaton, Joseph)
April 20, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph G Eaton on behalf of Johnson & Johnson (Eaton, Joseph)
April 3, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Zantac Corporation, Family Dollar, Sanofi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, CVS. Waiver of Service due by 5/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Complaint) (jdb)
April 3, 2023 Filing 4 ***ENTERED IN ERROR*** Summons Issued as to CVS, Family Dollar, Glaxo Smith Kline, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Sanofi, Zantac Corporation. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (cc: USMS)(jdb)
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; DEFERS payment of the filing fee; ORDERS the Plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee from the proceeds of any recovery received in this case; and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to request Waiver of Service from (and if necessary the United States Marshals Service to serve process on) (1) Defendant Zantac Corporation at 342 W. 47th St., New York, NY, 10036, (2) Defendant Family Dollar at 1041 Monroe Rd., Matthews, NC, 28105, (3) Defendant Sanofi at 55 Corporate Dr., Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, (4) Defendant Glaxo Smith Kline at 2929 Walnut St. Ste. 1700, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, (5) Defendant Pfizer at 235 E. 42nd St., New York, NY, 10017, (6) Defendant Johnson & Johnson at 1 Johnson & Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, NJ, 08933, (7) Defendant Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc at 900 Ridgebury Rd., Ridgefield, CT, 06877, and (8) Defendant CVS at 1 CVS Dr., Woonsocket, RI, 02895, with a copy of this Order and the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 04/03/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
March 28, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Cynthia Pierce. (nhc)
March 28, 2023 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Boehringer Ingelheim, CVS, Family Dollar, Glaxo Smith Kline, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Sanofi, Zantac Corporation, filed by Cynthia Pierce. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 USM 285 Forms). (nhc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pierce v. Zantac Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zantac Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Family Dollar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanofi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glaxo Smith Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pfizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Represented By: Beth A Behrens
Represented By: Joseph G Eaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?