Holtcamp v. Otto Trucking, Inc. et al
| Bryan Holtcamp |
| Otto Trucking, Inc. and Mamurjon K. Jumaniyazov |
| 2:2023cv00396 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| John E Martin |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER granting #21 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney J Thomas Vetne ORDERED WITHDRAWN. Attorney Brian Gates remains counsel of record for Defendants. Text order entry. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/10/2024. (smb)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Defendants Mamurjon K. Jumaniyazov, Otto Trucking, Inc.. (Vetne, J)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Motion to Continue. Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference on 1/11/2024 is RESET to 2/8/2024 09:30 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(F) now due 2/2/2024. Parties are instructed to call 833-568-8864; enter Meeting ID 161 0956 8055; Push # to skip Participant ID; enter Passcode 815985 when prompted. Text order entry. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/8/2024. (smb)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION to Continue Preliminary Pretrial Conference by Defendant Otto Trucking, Inc.. (Gates, Brian)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Appearance by Brian R Gates on behalf of All Defendants (Gates, Brian)
|
|
Filing 17
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby GRANTS the Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside State Courts Order of 11/15/2023 #15 and ORDERS that the state courts order dated 11/15/2023, is vacated. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 01/03/2024. (sej)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information (Vetne, J)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Set Aside State Court Order of November 15, 2023 by Plaintiff Bryan Holtcamp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Benton, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 14
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties.. (smb)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER & NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/11/2024 10:30 AM Central before Magistrate Judge John E Martin. Proposed joint discovery plan in accordance with FRCP 26(f) due by 1/5/2024.Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/28/2023. (smb)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 11/20/2023. (smb)
|
|
**NEW CASE** Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge John E Martin added. (shk)
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Otto Trucking, Inc.. (Vetne, J)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Otto Trucking, Inc.. (Vetne, J)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by J Thomas Vetne on behalf of All Defendants (Vetne, J)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AINNDC-5414480.) from Porter Superior Court, Cause No. 64D05-2308-CT-007863, filed by Mamurjon K. Jumaniyazov, Otto Trucking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vetne, J)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
