Grubl v. Walmart Superstore #1479
| JORDAN GRUBL |
| WALMART SUPERSTOR #1479 and Walmart Superstore #1479 |
| Galen Bradley |
| 2:2023cv00436 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 TELEPHONIC RULE 16 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held on 1/19/2024, before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. Pla appeared by atty Duke Escue. Dft appeared by atty James Balog. The Report filed as DE #10 is APPROVED IN PART as follows: Initial Disclosures to be exchanged by 3/12/2024. The last date to seek leave of court to join additional parties and to amend the pleadings for Pltf is 4/19/2024; for Dft is 5/17/2024. Fact discovery to be completed by 8/30/2024. Galen Bradley appointed as mediator. Results of the mediation shall be filed with the court no later than 10 days before the final pretrial conference. Telephonic Status Conference set for 9/6/2024 09:30 AM Central time before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. Parties are instructed to dial 833-568-8864, enter Meeting ID 161 6723 3388 and passcode 649671 when prompted to join the conference. Magistrate Consent forms due by 2/9/2024. All other dates/ddls to be set by presiding judge at a later time. (tc) Modified on 1/19/2024 to add text (tc). |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Guzman, Alejandra) |
| Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties. (tc) |
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING: Telephonic Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 1/19/2024 09:30 AM Central time before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. Parties are instructed to dial 833-568-8864, enter Meeting ID 161 6723 3388 and passcode 649671 when prompted to join the conference. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 12/28/2023. (tc)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Walmart Superstore #1479.(Guzman, Alejandra) Modified on 1/2/2024 to link to complaint (mlc). |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 12/12/2023. (tc)
|
| Judge Theresa L Springmann and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. NEW CASE. (nal) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Alejandra M Guzman on behalf of Walmart Superstore #1479 (Guzman, Alejandra) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James P Balog on behalf of Walmart Superstore #1479 (Balog, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINNDC-5433335) from Porter County Superior Court, Cause No. 64D05-2310-CT-009333, filed by Walmart Superstore #1479. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit State Court Record). (Balog, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
