Porter v. Starks et al
Plaintiff: Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant: Christopher Starks, Mark S Watson, Natalie Bokota, Bernard A Carter, Arturo Miguel Balcazar, Indiana State Bar Association and Diego Morales
Case Number: 2:2024cv00034
Filed: January 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Referring Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party via cert # 7021 2720 0002 3685 7112) (ash)
March 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The deadline to file the amended complaint came and went without Porter filing one. The remaining claim against Officer Stark is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 3/20/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party via cert # 7021 2720 0002 3685 7112)(ash)
February 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RECEIPT of Notice to Remove Cause #45G02-2311-F6-002611 to United States District Court Northern District of Indiana from Reginald Darnell Porter. (jdb)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff Reginald Darnell Porter's amended complaint #4 is DISMISSED, as follows: Porter's claims against Defendants Mark Watson, Natalie Bokota, Bernard Carter, Arturo Miguel Balcazar, Diego Morales, the Indiana State Bar Association, and Indiana Secretary of State are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Porter's claim against Defendant Christopher Stark is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Porter is ORDERED to file an amended complaint, on or before 3/18/2024 as directed in this order. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/16/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(shk)
February 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Arturo Miguel Balcazar, Natalie Bokota, Bernard A Carter, Indiana State Bar Association, Diego Morales, Christopher Starks, Mark S Watson, filed by Reginald Darnell Porter.(jdb)
February 15, 2024 Opinion or Order ***Amended Pleadings Deadline terminated. (jdb)
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Plaintiff Reginald Darnell Porter's complaint #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Porter is ORDERED to file an amended complaint on or before 03/06/2024. If he fails to do so, this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 02/05/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
January 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Reginald Darnell Porter. (rmf)
January 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Arturo Miguel Balcazar, Natalie Bokota, Bernard A Carter, Indiana State Bar Association, Diego Morales, Christopher Starks, Mark S Watson, filed by Reginald Darnell Porter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(rmf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Porter v. Starks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald Darnell Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Starks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark S Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Natalie Bokota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bernard A Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arturo Miguel Balcazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Indiana State Bar Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diego Morales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?