Acuity v. Load n Go Express LLC et al
Acuity, a Wisconsin mutual insurance company |
Marland Tirrell Barner, United States Steel Corporation and Load n Go Express LLC |
2:2024cv00398 |
November 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Acuity, a Wisconsin mutual insurance company. (Ross, Brendan) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to United States Steel Corporation on 11/07/24 by Acuity, a Wisconsin mutual insurance company. Waiver of Service due by 12/9/2024. (Ross, Brendan) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons filed by Acuity, a Wisconsin mutual insurance company. (Ross, Brendan) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons filed by Acuity, a Wisconsin mutual insurance company. (Ross, Brendan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Brendan C Ross on behalf of Acuity, a Wisconsin mutual insurance company (Ross, Brendan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against Load n Go Express LLC, Marland Tirrell Barner, United States Steel Corporation( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AINNDC-5734181.), filed by Acuity, a Wisconsin mutual insurance company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ross, Brendan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.