Bodnar v. Chidester
Plaintiff: Steve Bodnar
Defendant: David L Chidester
Case Number: 3:2007cv00197
Filed: April 25, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: South Bend Office
County: Porter
Presiding Judge: Robert L Miller Jr
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER dismissing case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A(b). Clerk directed to send copy of Order and 1 Complaint to the Superintendent of the Pendleton Facility (copies sent). ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 5/3/07. (ksc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bodnar v. Chidester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Bodnar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David L Chidester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?