Range v. Brubaker et al
| Stephen A Range |
| Devin Brubaker, Kimberly Lucas, Karen Balsbaugh, Gary Libby, Catherine M Toppel, Keith Vergon, Suzanne Dieter, Sara Janis, Scott Ruszkowski, Ann Carol Nash, Timothy A Rouse, Karen L White and Lynn Berndt |
| 3:2007cv00480 |
| October 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| St. Joseph |
| William C Lee |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
465
ORDER granting 462 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant Broden. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 12/14/09. (sdf)
|
|
Filing
464
OPINION AND ORDER: All remaining official capacity claims against Lynn Berndt are terminated. Office of the Procesuting Attorney is terminated as a party from this case. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 10/16/09. (sdf)
|
|
Filing
461
ORDER Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/30/09, Plaintiffs Motion for a Continuance to Enable Discovery to be Undertaken [DE 414] is GRANTED and he has ninety (90) days to complete additional discovery as outlined in order as to Defendant Brubaker; t he Motion for Default Judgment as to CityDefendants [DE 416], the Motion to Reconsider Court Orders 391 and 406 [DE 417], the Motion to Withdraw [DE 421], the Motion for Sanctions [DE 425], and the Motion for Sanctions [DE 426] are all DENIED as MOOT. The Motion for Leave to Amend and File a Third Amended Complaint [DE 304] is DENIED. Discovery deadline is 12/30/2009.). (lrm)
|
|
Filing
460
OPINION AND ORDER denying 449 Motion for Sanctions; granting 329 Motion for Summary Judgment as to defendants Sara Janis, Scott Ruszkowski, An Carol Nash, timothy7 A Rouse, Karen L White Animal Care and Control, City of South Bend, Kimberly Balsb augh, Gary Libby, Robert Sheler, Department of Code Enforcement, Catherine Toppel, South Bend Police Department, Charles S Leone, Mayor Office, South Bend Common Council, City Clerks Office, Lynn Coleman, Keith Vergon and Suzanne Dieter. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/29/09. (sdf)
|
|
Filing
459
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Devin Brubaker's 389 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 411 Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike ; granting 432 Motion to Amend Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 415 Moiton for Sanctions. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/25/09. (sdf) Modified on 9/25/2009 (lrm).
|
|
Filing
457
OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Lynn Berndt's 164 Motion for Summary Judgment, denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions contained in document 171 . Signed by Judge William C Lee on 7/8/09. (sdf) Modified on 7/8/2009 (sdf). Modified on 7/10/2009 to add text "as moot" (smp).
|
|
Filing
455
ORDER denying 110 Motions for Summary Judgment and for Sanctions; denying 113 , 114 , 118 , 120 , 138 , 160 , 168 , 169 , 176 , 211 , 213 , and 255 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 3/31/09. (kds)
|
|
Filing
454
OPINION AND ORDER : Defendants are ordered not to respond to motions numbers [435 thru 447], and 449 until further order of this court. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 3/4/09. (sdf)
|
|
Filing
410
OPINION AND ORDER denying 407 Motion for Sanctions for reasons state in Court's January 26th order 406 . Signed by Judge William C Lee on 1/29/09. (sdf) Modified on 1/30/2009 to add text (smp).
|
|
Filing
406
OPINION AND ORDER denying 393 Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike ; denying 394 Motion for Sanctions; denying 395 Motion for Sanctions; denying 396 Motion for Sanctions; denying 397 Motion for Sanctions; denying 398 Motion for Sanctions; denying 399 Motion for Sanctions; denying 400 Motion for Sanctions; denying 401 Motion for Sanctions; denying 402 Motion for Sanctions; denying 403 Motion for Sanctions; denying 404 Motion for Sanctions; denying 405 Motion for Sanctions all as frivolous. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 1/26/09. (sdf) Modified on 1/27/2009 to add text that this is an Opinion (smp).
|
|
Filing
391
OPINION AND ORDER, GRANTING Motion 382 , striking entries 369 , 370 , 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 376 ( Response to City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment) be filed by 2/23/2009). Signed by Judge William C Lee on 1/21/09. (sdf) Modified on 1/21/2009 (sdf).
|
|
Filing
383
OPINION AND ORDER denying 364 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 1/13/09. (sdf)
|
|
Filing
354
OPINION AND ORDER denying 353 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/23/08. (sdf)
|
|
Filing
344
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 323 Motion to Compel; granting Plaintiff's 338 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Plaintiff's Response to 329 Defendants' Motion for Summary Jud gment to be filed by 1/20/2009); denying Plaintiff's 339 Motion to Compel; denying Plaintiff's 341 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 342 Motion for leave to file a Legthy emoradum in Response to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 12/16/08. (sdf) Modified on 12/17/2008 to show correct DE # for pending deft s/j motion (lrm).
|
|
Filing
317
OPINION AND ORDER denying 301 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Mr Range's 300 objection to court's order 297 is overruled. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 10/20/08. (sdf) Modified on 10/21/2008 to add text (smp).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
