Heitz v. LaPorte County Adult Probation Department et al
Jack Heitz |
LaPorte County Adult Probation Department, Robert Schuster and Jacqueline D Dermody |
3:2008cv00037 |
January 22, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
LaPorte |
Robert L Miller Jr |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER denying 73 Motion for Reconsideration re 71 Opinon and Order. Plaintiff afforded until 12/18/2009 within which to renew his motion to vacate the judgment along with a copy of his response to the defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 11/30/09. (ksc) |
Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of defendants. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 8/4/09. (ksc) |
Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff leave to amend his complaint and STRIKING 29 Amended Complaint. This case remains pending before the court on the plaintiff's original complaint. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 3/2/09. (ksc) |
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 2/25/09. (ksc) Modified on 2/27/2009 to update text (jld). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.