Bailey v. Pregis Innovative Packaging Inc
Plaintiff: Michelle L Bailey
Defendant: Pregis Innovative Packaging Inc
Case Number: 3:2008cv00332
Filed: July 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Fulton
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER granting 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment in favor of Pregis Innovative Packaging Inc and against Michelle L. Bailey. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 9/14/09. (ksc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Pregis Innovative Packaging Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle L Bailey
Represented By: Roy D Burbrink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pregis Innovative Packaging Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?