Finnegan et al v. Myers et al
| Roman Finnegan, Lynette Finnegan and Tabitha Abair |
| Laurel Myers, Regina McAninch, Tracy Salyers, Reba James, James Payne, Jennifer McDonald, Antoinette Laskey and John Does 1-20 |
| 3:2008cv00503 |
| October 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| LaPorte |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
409
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 381 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Related to Plaintiffs' Petition for Attorney Fees (Renewed) by Defendants Reba James, Regina McAninch, Jennifer McDonald, Laurel Myers. The Plaintiffs' Petition for Attorney Fees (DE # 358 ) is STAYED during the pendency of the appeal. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 12/12/2016. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
378
OPINION AND ORDER: State Defendants 354 Rule 59 MOTION to Alter Judgment or Amend Judgment by Reducing Damages filed by the State Defendants, Laurel Myers, Regina McAninch, Reba James, and Jennifer McDonald is DENIED. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 9/30/16. (mc)
|
|
Filing
321
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 205 Motion to exclude or limit the testimony of eight of Plaintiffs expert Witnesses. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 9/14/2015. (rmn)
|
|
Filing
315
OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 200 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Reba James, Regina McAninch, Jennifer McDonald, Laurel Myers, James Payne, Tracy Salyers and DENYING 248 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Inadmissible Evidence by Reba James, Regina McAninch, Jennifer McDonald, Laurel Myers, James Payne, Tracy Salyers. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 9/8/2015. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
167
OPINION AND ORDER denying 166 Motion to Reconsider. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 8/19/13. (smp)
|
|
Filing
163
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and overruling in part 159 Order. Plaintiffs' objection to the Magistrate Judge's order precluding expert reports is granted, and this matter is referred bck to Judge Nuechterlein to set a new deadline for expert reports. The objection to the Magistrate Judge limiting the Plaintiffs to three final depositions is OVERRULED and this ruling stands. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 8/5/13. (smp)
|
|
Filing
152
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 121 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; motion is granted as to: Katelynn, Johnathon, and Tabitha's 1st amendment violation claims in Count 1; Count 3; the equal protection an d ADA claims in Count 4; and the request for injunctive relief which are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; the motion is DENIED as to the remaining claims against the State Defendants; DENYING 134 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 6/5/13. (smp)
|
|
Filing
143
OPINION AND ORDER denying 122 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 1/30/13. (smp)
|
|
Filing
105
OPINION AND ORDER overruling 92 Objections to the Magistrate Judge's June 5, 2012 Order. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 7/24/12. (smp)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER denying 44 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 48 Rule 12(f) Motion to Strike; denying 53 Motion to Supplement. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 3/1/11. (ksc)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 4/7/09. (kds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
