Williams v. South Bend Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Jerome Williams, Jr
Defendant: South Bend Police Department, James Taylor, Bayne Bennett and Brian Young
Case Number: 3:2009cv00017
Filed: January 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: St. Joseph
Presiding Judge: William C Lee
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 OPINION AND ORDER denying 42 MOTION to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/16/09. (ksc)
August 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER re: 38 Motion for Relief from Order. The motion is DENIED as to plaintiff's request for relief from the court's denial of his motion for leave to amend his complaint. The motion is GRANTED as to plaintiff's reques t to clarify his complaint. The court sua sponte DISMISSES the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) because the complaint, as clarified, states no claim against the defendants upon which relief can be granted. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 8/20/09. (ksc)
August 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER denying 29 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 8/3/09. (ksc) Modified (opinion) on 8/4/2009 (ksc).
May 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed against defendants Taylor, Bennett and Young on his Fourth Amendment false arrest and prosecution claim; dismissing South Bend Police Department; and directing US Marshals Service to effect service of process upon defendants Taylor, Bennett and Young. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 5/13/09. (ksc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. South Bend Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerome Williams, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Bend Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayne Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?