Delap v. Federal-Mogul Powertrain Inc
Plaintiff: Dale E Delap
Defendant: Federal-Mogul Powertrain Inc
Case Number: 3:2009cv00073
Filed: February 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: Philip P Simon
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:0631(a) Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 32 Rule 56 Motion to Strike. Judgment in favor of Federal-Mogul. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 4/15/2010. (kds)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Delap v. Federal-Mogul Powertrain Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dale E Delap
Represented By: Roy D Burbrink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal-Mogul Powertrain Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?