Betzner et al
Plaintiff: First Federal Savings Bank
Case Number: 3:2009cv00128
Filed: March 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: St. Joseph
Presiding Judge: William C Lee
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1334 Bankruptcy Appeal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER granting 22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Incurred on Appeal filed by First Federal Savings Bank. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 11/6/09. (kds)
September 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 FINAL OPINION AND ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL. The opinion of the Bankruptcy Court is hereby AFFIRMED. Betzner's 23 First RULE 12(f) MOTION to Strike Appellee's Motion for an award of Attorney's fees and costs incurred on Appeal is deemed MOOT; If Betzner has a response re 22 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Incurred on Appeal, the response is due by 10/9/2009. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/9/09. (ksc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Betzner et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: First Federal Savings Bank
Represented By: Stephen H Downs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?