Boney v. Hamilton Grove
Plaintiff: Christine Boney
Defendant: Hamilton Grove
Case Number: 3:2009cv00158
Filed: April 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: St. Joseph
Presiding Judge: Christopher A Nuechterlein
Presiding Judge: Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION AND ORDER granting 9 MOTION to Dismiss complaint without prejudice filed by Hamilton Grove. Any amendments to the complaint to be filed by 8/27/2009. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 7/27/09. (kds)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boney v. Hamilton Grove
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Boney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hamilton Grove
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?