Boyd v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
| Russell Ernest Boyd |
| Correctional Medical Services Inc, Michael A Mitcheff, Dr Rachel L Ross MD, John Dallas, John Isreal MD, Deana Jordan, Barbara Brubaker, Harriet Woolever and Dr James Vanfleit MD |
| 3:2009cv00537 |
| November 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| LaPorte |
| William C Lee |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants 80 Motion for Summary Judgment; this case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 9/25/12. cc: Boyd (mc)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER denying 30 Motion for Temprorary Restraining Order for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice, to the Plaintiff's right to refile it in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 3/1/10. (ksc)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER granting pltff leave to proceed against the dfts on his 8th Amendment failure to protect and delay of medical treatement claims; ordering dfts to respond as provided for in the FRCP; and directing the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service of process on the dfts. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 1/15/10. (ksc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
