Dotson v. St Joe County Jail et al
| Dewange Lewis Dotson |
| St Joe County Jail, Julie Lawson, Heath Deputy, Marvel Deputy and Mary Lee Shirley Burns |
| 3:2009cv00543 |
| October 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Miami |
| James T Moody |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER granting 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment and entering judtment in favor of the defendant. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 6/30/2011. (kds)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 Motion to preserve affirmative defense for trial. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 7/19/2010. (kds)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER granting Dotson leave to proceed on Fourteenth Amendment exvessive force claim against Deputy Heath, dismisses St Joseph County Sheriffs Department; dismisses all other claims; grants motion 15 and directs USM to effect service. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 3/18/2010. (kds)
|
|
Filing
9
OPINION AND ORDER grants Dotson to proceed on his Fourteenth Amendedment excessive force claim against Deputy Heath; dismisses all other claims; dismissing Marvel Deputy, St Joe County Jail, Mary Lee Shirley Burns and Julie Lawson and directs USM to effect service on Deputy Heath. Signed by Senior Judge James T Moody on 2/19/2010. (kds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
