In Re: Pier 39 LLC Bankruptcy of

Appellant: Pier 39 LLC
Appellee: J Richard Ransel
Case Number: 3:2011cv00493
Filed: December 22, 2011
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: South Bend Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 2, 2012 9 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY APPEAL re 1 Bankruptcy Appeal Court Case 11-33733, filed by Pier 39 LLC AFFIRMING the decision of the bankruptcy court. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 5/2/12. (smp) Modified on 5/3/2012- (Copy to Judge Dees chambers via e-mail) (smp).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Pier 39 LLC Bankruptcy of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Pier 39 LLC
Represented By: Edward P Benchik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: J Richard Ransel
Represented By: Lisa Gilkey Schoetzow
Represented By: J Richard Ransel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.