DePuy Orthopaedics Inc v. Orthopaedic Hospital
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 1, 2016
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 216 MOTION for Reconsideration of Portions of the Court's Order of August 1, 2016 by Plaintiff DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. The stay of production (DE 228 ) is LIFTED. Plaintiff DePuy Orthopaedics Inc ORDERED to provide c omplete responses to Defendant Orthopaedic Hospital's request for jointly privileged documents and testimony related to the prosecution of the 110 Patent Family applications by 12/15/2016. Clerk DIRECTED to unseal the Court's Order dated 8/ 1/2016, as decided from the bench on 9/29/2016 (DE 213 ). The Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (DE 215 ) having also been granted from the bench on 9/29/2016, Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Portions of the Court's Order of 8/1/2016 (DE 216 ) under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 12/1/16. (cer)
|January 8, 2016
OPINION AND ORDER: With this order, the deadlines defined in Local Patent Rules 5-1 and 6-1 are now triggered as to the patent issues raised in this consolidated action. Telephonic Status Conference SET for 1/25/2016 10:30 AM in US District Court - South Bend before Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein for the purpose of establishing all other necessary discovery and motion deadlines, including those related to the remaining contract liability issues. Court will call all counsel list ed on the docket sheet unless it is notified that specified attorneys need not be contacted. If, at the time of the scheduled conference, any participating attorney will not be at the telephone number identified on the docket, please contact chambers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher A Nuechterlein on 1/8/2016. (tc)
|February 22, 2013
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 14 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 2/22/2013. (lyf)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?