Martin v. NIPSCO et al
| Kurt Martin |
| St Joseph County Board of Commissioners, U S House of Representatives, Northern Trust Corporation, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, NIPSCO, Citimortgage Inc, Andrew P Seiwert, Feiwell & Hannoy PC, Coldwell Banker, Internal Revenue Service, United States Incorporated, The Company Corporation and United States Senate |
| 3:2013cv00052 |
| January 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| St. Joseph |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Philip P Simon |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER striking 12 MOTION for Order to Show Cause, 15 MOTION for Default Judgment as to, 25 MOTION for Order to Show Cause, 11 MOTION to Amend/Correct 8 Order on Motion for Order to Show Cause, Order on Motion to Stay. Motion granted in part and denying in part 26 RULE 12(f) MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Filing and Dismiss Northern Trust with Prejudice, or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss Plaintiff's Filings with Prejudice, or, in the Alternative, to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgmen filed by Northern Trust Corporation. However, his lawsuit remains DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 5/29/2013. (kds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
