Underhill v. Uhle et al
| Ricky Lee Underhill |
| M Uhle, J Townsend and M Schoettmer |
| 3:2013cv00939 |
| September 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Henry |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
OPINION AND ORDER granting 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of defendants Mary Uhle, Joseph Townsend, and Matthew Schoettmer. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/6/2015. (rmc)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff leave to proceed against M Uhle, J Townsend and M Schoettmer in their individual capacities for monetary damages for failing to protect them from an attack by another inmate; DISMISSING all other claims in 1 Pro Se Complaint; GRANTING 3 Motion for Service of Process by USM; DIRECTING USM to effect service of process on M Uhle, J Townsend and M Schoettmer; ORDERING M Uhle, J Townsend and M Schoettmer to respond only to the claim for which pro se Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this Order. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/10/2013. (Proposed Summons and USM 285 forms provided by Plaintiff, a copy of this Order, and copies of the Complaint sent to USM for service) (lyb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
