Maxie v. Bruemmer et al
Michael Maxie |
Edward Bruemmer, Mr Hornes, Michael Scott and Mark E Levenhagen |
3:2013cv01280 |
November 29, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
LaPorte |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Philip P Simon |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment 79 ; DENIES the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 87 ; DENIES the plaintiff's motion for ruling 93 ; and DIRECTS the clerk to enter judgment in favor of defendants Edward Bruemmer, Michael Scott, Mark Levenhagen and Mr. Horne. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 7/5/2016. (lhc)(cc: Plaintiff) |
Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed against Levenhagen, Scott, Horne and Bruemmer; dismisses IDOC and Bruce Lemmon. Party Indiana Department of Corrections and Bruce Lemmon (Commissioner) terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 8/4/2014. (kds) |
Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 10 Motion for entry of judgment; grants plaintiff leave to proceed against Mark Levenhagen, Michael Scott, Mr Hornes, and Edward Bruemmer in their individual capacities for monetary damages for housing him under substandard conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES any and all other claims in the complaint; and directs USM to effect service. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 5/1/14. (smp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.