Manley v. Indiana Department of Correction
| James E Manley |
| Indiana Department of Correction |
| 3:2013cv01308 |
| December 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Miami |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| John E Martin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 80 MOTION to Amend Judgment filed by James E Manley. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 10/5/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
|
|
Filing
78
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants R Beemer, Kelli Bradley, Robert Eutz, R Hobbs, Koppensparger, J Larimore, Mark Sevier, Thomas. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Clerk DIRECTED to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/23/17. (Copy mailed to pro se party).(cer)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS James E. Manley leave to proceed against Superintendent Mark Sevier, Program Director Robert Eutz, Sergeant Kopensparger, Officer Thomas, Internal Affairs Investigator R. Hobbs, Officer J. Larimore, Sergeant R. Beeme r, and Classification Supervisor Kelli Bradley as outlined in the order; DISMISSES all other claims; DISMISSES Assistant Superintendent Kevin Mulrooney, Production Assistant Debroah Krise, Casework Manager Kimberly Snow, and Lt. R. Sterling; DIRECT S the United States Marshals Service to effect Service of Process; and ORDERS Superintendent Mark Sevier, Internal Affairs Investigator R. Hobbs, Program Director Robert Eutz, Classification Supervisor Kelli Bradley, Sergeant R. Beemer, Sergeant Ko pensparger, Officer J. Larimore, and Officer Thomas to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. IND. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/6/2015. cc: USMS, Manley (tc)
|
|
Filing
3
OPINION AND ORDER denying 1 Motion for TRO; directs Clerk to place case number on a blank prisoner complaint form and send it to pla Manley; GRANTS Manley to 01/16/2014 to submit the complaint; and CAUTIONS Manley that if he does not respond by th at deadline, this case will be dismissed without further notice pursuant to 28 USC 1915A because it does not state a claim. Deficiency to be cured by 1/16/2014. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 12/5/2013. (cc: Manley with forms included) (rmn) Modified on 12/5/2013 typo (rmn).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Manley v. Indiana Department of Correction | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James E Manley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Indiana Department of Correction | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
