Jones v. LaPorte County Sheriff's Department et al
| Michael A Jones |
| LaPorte County Sheriff's Department, LaPorte Indiana County of, Stephen Vance and Scott Bell |
| 3:2013cv01330 |
| December 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| LaPorte |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Scott Bell, LaPorte County Sheriff's Department, LaPorte Indiana County of, Stephen Vance and DISMISSING the amended complaint WITH PREJUDICE. GRANTING IN PART AND DEN YING IN PART 55 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike Affidavit of John Alexander Israel by Defendants Scott Bell, LaPorte County Sheriff's Department, LaPorte Indiana County of, Stephen Vance; GRANTED as to paragraphs 10-15 of Dr. Israel's affidavit, which are STRICKEN as inadmissible testimony. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 3/29/2016. (lhc)
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION. Based on Mr. Joness stated intent to withdraw his claims under section 1981 and the parties stipulation, the Plaintiffs section 1981 claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court DISMISSES AS MOOT the Motion of Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, In Part. DE 8 . Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 7/24/2014. (rmc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
