Anthony Wayne Corporation v. Elco Industries Inc et al
Anthony Wayne Corporation |
Elco Industries Inc, Elco Textron Inc, Tinnerman Palnut Inc and A Raymond Tinnerman Manufacturing Inc |
3:2013cv01406 |
December 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Allen |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Philip P Simon |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part A. Raymond Tinnerman Manufacturing, Inc.s 86 Motion for Summary Judgment: it is GRANTED IN PART as to Counts I, II and III, AND DENIED IN PART as to Count IV, which remains pending. Defendants Elco Industries, Inc., Elco Textron, Inc. and Elco Fastening Systems, LLCs 89 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all five counts of the third amended complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 2/19/16. (mc) |
Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Counts I and II of the amended complaint are dismissed without prejud ice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff Anthony Wayne Corporation will have 30 days to file an amended complaint in an attempt to replead Counts I and II should it choose to do so. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 10/17/2014. (kds) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.