Thomas v. Zonder et al
Vincent Thomas |
Robert Zonder, Robert Strader, Michigan City Indiana City of and Amalgamated Union Transit |
3:2014cv00164 |
January 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
LaPorte |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Philip P Simon |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 77 RULE 56 MOTION to Strike by Defendant City of Michigan City Indiana; GRANTING 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant City of Michigan City Indiana. The clerk shall ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of the City of Michigan City and against Vincent Thomas. The clerk shall treat this civil action as TERMINATED. All further settings in this action are hereby VACATED. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 12/16/2015. (lhc) |
Filing 58 OPINION AND ORDER granting Thomass 45 Motion to voluntarily dismiss Defendants Robert Strader, Robert Zonder, and Amalgamated Transit Union under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) ; denying AS MOOT Zonders 43 Motion to Dismiss ; granting in part and denying in part Michigan Citys 50 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ; dismissing Count II charging age discrimination, but retaining Count I alleging race discrimination under both Title VII and Section 1981.. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 6/9/15. (mc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.