Siers v. McGuire et al
| Jerry Lee Siers |
| Shawn McGuire and Mike Davis |
| WVCF (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2014cv02031 |
| November 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Sullivan |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant Mike Davis' Motion for Summary Judgment 63 is GRANTED. The Clerk should enter judgment in favor of Mike Davis and against Jerry Lee Siers accordingly. Defendant Mike Davis' Rule 56 Motion to Strike 70 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 2/15/2018. (jss)
|
|
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER re 2 Pro Se Complaint; GRANT pla leave to proceed against Detective Shawn McGuire in his individual capacity for monetary damages for using excessive force against him on August 7, 2013; GRANT pla leave to proceed against Detec tive Mike Davis in his individual capacity for monetary damages for failing to intervene in Detective McGuires use of excessive force on August 7, 2013; DISMISS any and all other claims contained in the complaint; DIRECT the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service of processand ORDER Det. McGuire and Det. Davis to respond only to the claim for which the pro se pla has been granted leave to proceeding in this screening order. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 6/15/2015. (cc: Siers)(rmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
