Orr v. Lemmon et al
Michael Orr |
Bruce Lemmon, William K Wilson, Howard Morton, Robert Hough, V Taylor, S Brown and John Doe |
PENDLETON E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
3:2014cv02079 |
December 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Madison |
William C Lee |
Christopher A Nuechterlein |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 18 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; GRANTS Michael Orr leave to proceed against Officer S. Brown in his individual capacity for compensatory and punitive damages for orchestrating and condoning an at tack on him by an inmate on 12/15/2012, in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSING all other claims; DISMISSING Bruce Lemmon, William K. Wilson, Howard Morton, Robert Hough, and Officer V. Taylor; DIRECTING the clerk to transmit the summons and USM-285 forms for Officer S. Brown to the USMS along with a copy of the amended complaint 17 and this order; DIRECTING the USMS, pursuant to 28:1915(d), to effect service of process on Officer S. Brown; and ORDERING, pursuant to 42:1997e(g)(2) , that Officer S. Brown respond, as provided for in the Fed R Civ P and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claim for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 1/19/2016. (lhc)(cc: Plaintiff/USMS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.