Never Lost Golf, LLC et al v. Steinert et al
| Never Lost Golf, LLC, Michael Carnell and The N.L.G. Living Trust |
| Maia Steinert, Chrisoph Stephan, Ralf Menwegen, Steinert & Stephan, Markus Schumann and HarriBert Pamp |
| 3:2015cv00489 |
| October 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| St. Joseph |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 11 MOTION (First) for Default Judgment as to Non-Answering Defendant Harribert Pamp by Plaintiffs Michael Carnell, Never Lost Golf, LLC, The N.L.G. Living Trust; GRANTING 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(bi F)(2) & (3) by Defendants Markus Schumann, Maia Steinert, Chrisoph Stephan. All claims against Defendants Maia Steinert, Christoph Stephan and Markus Schumann are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This leaves Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Ralf Menwegen, Steinert & Stephan and HarriBert Pamp. Each LLC and Trust Plaintiff WARNED that the Court will dismiss it without further notice if counsel does not enter an appearance for it by 10/11/2016. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 9/27/16. (cc: ADM Hotels and Resorts Group LLC; Never Lost Golf LLC; The N.L.G. Living Trust; Michael Carnell; Ralf Menwegen). (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
